Sunday, April 5, 2009

SBI Mutual Fund targets Rs 12 crore in Orissa from GETS

The SBI Mutual Fund, the leading fund house of the country, expects to mobilise Rs 12 crore from Orissa for its newly launched SBI Gold Exchange Traded Scheme (GETS). It targets to mobilise about Rs 70 crore in the east and Rs 200 nationally from this scheme.
“ We hope to mobilise about Rs 12 crore in Orissa for the GETS and Rs 70 crore in the east”, Manoj Kumar Sinha, zonal head, SBI Fund Management Private Ltd. told Business Standard.
Sinha said, though the people were investing in gold physically, they were not investing through GETS, incurring additional costs in the process. The potential investors can diversify their investment and invest efficiently through this scheme. The new fund offer (NFO) for GETS will close on 28 April 2009. Launching of the GETS was significant as the company didn’t have this product in its product basket.
The minimum investment will be Rs 5000 and there is no upper limit. It will focus on the retail and the High Networth Individuals (HNIs) for mobilisation of the targeted funds. One month after the closing, the fund will be listed in the National Stock Exchange.
Orissa was one among the best performing regions of the company and net business during the last fiscal in the state was about Rs 400 crore. In terms of asset under management (AMU), SBI Mutual Fund enjoys a market share of 25 percent, he added.
Chittaranjan Panda, chief manager, Bhubaneswar said, the company intended to penetrate more areas in the state. Though it has network expansion plan, it is yet to be finalised. The company has 2 branches at Rourkela and Bhubaneswar and 6 districts are covered through business associates.

Fresh reforms for MF industry

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) is finalising a second round of reforms for the mutual fund (MF) industry. The regulator is considering a slew of measures intended to protect investors’ interests and to ensure that fund houses have smoother and better regulated operations.
fixed maturities plans (FMPs) after last October’s liquidity crisis when funds faced heavy redemption.
It had earlier proposed that investors write a separate cheque for commissions paid to fund distributors in addition to the usual investment cheque in the name of the fund house.
Although distributors did not support this idea, Sebi favours the separate cheque system as distributors will get a commission based on the services they render.
At present, asset management companies (AMCs) pay the distributors directly with investors bearing an entry load. There is a disconnect in this system as distributors are directly paid by fund houses for services they are supposed to provide to investors. If approved, the proposal is expected to end up reducing the commission as investors would prefer to negotiate the same, depending on the services they receive.
Sources at Sebi point out that stock brokers were earlier charging huge commissions. It was only after competition increased that the rates automatically reduced, but the brokers have still survived.
The Association of Mutual Funds in India (Amfi), on its part, is working on an alternative arrangement and will soon submit three options to Sebi based on the experience overseas.
Last October’s liquidity crisis had also raised the issue of increasing networth requirements for AMCs from Rs 10 crore at present to Rs 50 crore. The idea was that, in case of huge losses, the high networth requirements would help a fund to survive its problems.
The argument against this was that some of the fund managers had floated mutual funds and high networth criteria may hinder such ventures. The view gaining currency now within the regulator is that assets under management of mutual funds floated by fund managers are not that big and, hence, increasing the networth requirement is important.
Also, last October’s crisis saw most of the redemption pressure coming from corporates. As a result, the regulator may ask funds to float separate schemes for corporates and non-corporate investors.
Sebi is also overhauling the seven-year-old risk management circular for mutual funds. The proposed amendments would focus on improving governance and risk management practices. Sebi is also insisting on separate portfolio and operation functions, proper empowerment for persons supervising risk management, ensuring that investments are carried out as per what is mentioned in offer documents and that investments follow established norms, among others.

AMFI suggests two-way load structure for MF products

The Association of Mutual Funds of India has suggested a two-way load structure for selling mutual fund products to investors comprising variable load and without any load.
Speaking on the sidelines of industry body Ficci's seminar here Association of Mutual Funds of India (AMFI) Chairman A P Kurian said the association has proposed what he called Plan A and Plan B.
Under Plan A, a variable load or commission could be charged depending upon the service or advice rendered by the distributor while under Plan B, there would be no load or commission charged to investors but the distributor would be compensated by the asset management company.
However, in that case, annual expenses charged to the schemes may need to be increased by 0.75 per cent, he said.
At present, investors need to pay a uniform commission of 2.5 per cent to distributors for mutual funds.
However, there is a view that the charges imposed on investors should be variable or linked to the extent of service rendered by the distributor.
The charges could be higher in case a distributor offers both service as well as advice, the quality of advice, etc., and charges could be less if the service rendered is minimum.

Sebi no to delaying different load structures for MFs

The mutual fund industry has been trying hard to convince Sebi to push back its
proposed decision to introduce variable load structures for mutual funds

India’s stock market regulator, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), has rejected a plea by the asset management industry to delay the introduction of variable load structures on mutual funds that will enable investors to negotiate the commissions they pay distributors.
The regulator is keen to push a decision soon and may take the matter to its board shortly, a person close to the development told CNBC-TV18.The mutual fund industry has been trying hard to convince Sebi to push back its proposed decision to introduce variable load structures for mutual funds. Once approved, investors will have the right to negotiate the commission they pay a distributor every time they buy a mutual fund.Mutual fund houses are concerned that distributors may be reluctant to push their products if the rule comes into force.”We have suggestions both in favour of this and against it. Some strong views in favour of it and strong views against it,” M.S. Sahoo, a whole-time member of Sebi, told CNBC-TV18. “We have to take a call but there is nothing called the right time...,” Sahoo said. In 1992-93, similar opposition had greeted a decision that required brokers to disclose brokerage fees they charged, Sahoo said.But the Association of Mutual Funds of India (Amfi) is still trying hard. It has insisted on a so-called multiple class share model if the regulator implements the variable load structure right away.The multiple-class share model is popular in the US wherein investors have different payment options depending on the amount they are willing to pay upfront. This, Amfi says, will mark a paradigm shift in the pricing of services offered.“Variable load structure could be implemented right away provided it is a part of the shift,” Amfi chairman A.P. Kurian said. “We just want that it should not be implemented in an ad hoc manner.”

Only 6 out of 38 AMCs making profit

Even as Mutual Funds manages assets worth billions of rupees, only a few of the mutual funds are making profits. Out of the 38 odd asset management companies (AMCs) or mutual funds (MFs), only about 5 or 6 are making profits, reports Economic Times.
This fact was pointed out by Vedprakash Chaturvedi, managing director of Tata Asset Management at FICCI seminar on capital markets. He also pointed out that there is a likelihood of consolidation taking place in the industry.
Nimesh Shah, managing director, ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company, said mutual funds make money by managing the assets. But if there is a 50% fall in assets under management, it impacts profits as the cost structures remain the same.
A P Kurian, chairman, Association of Mutual Funds of India, said the reason only a few mutual funds are making profits is that it is a volume game. With a fall in AUMs, the profits have gone down.

Opportunities are going to be there in 2009-10 to make a lot of money?

Ramesh Damani, Member, BSE, asks market experts about their outlook for the year 2010.
Madhu Kela, Head-Equity, Reliance MF, Investors will have to be very alert and markets will have lot of volatility. He believes that opportunities are going to be there in 2009-10 to make a lot of money.
Kela is quite confident that the bottom has been made in India. “If we don’t have a catastrophe government which is being formed and the policy reversal in India, some one was telling me that Prakash karat becoming the Finance Minister of India, so that scenarios are different obviously but barring that we may have seen the worst.”
“This is the time which we believe is a bottom up investing time rather than making those big sector calls. I think these are terrific times to pick stocks with longer-term horizons”, Kela stated.
Nilesh Shah, Deputy MD, ICICI Prudential AMC, believes that markets are at a time where history can be shaped or maybe the future. “If all of us go and vote sensibly? - will the market have different index, the answer is maybe. This is an era where lot of events are going to happen and they are going to shape how the markets are going to behave.”
Narayan Ramachandran, MD, Morgan Stanley, does not expect markets to gallop to a new high a year from now. “I do not think equity market is the asset class of choice on a forward one year view even though it may have a positive return.”
ehangir Aziz, Chief Economist, JP Morgan, said there is enough in the economy, in terms of policies undertaken in early part of this year and last December onwards, to get us through a pretty decent economic turnaround in the second half of the year.
Abhay Laijawala, Head-Research, Deutsche Bank, said currently we have a Sensex target of 11,500 for next year. However, he was quick to add that this target could change depending on the contours and the shape that the next government takes.

Mutual fund houses lost 36,798.58 crore in FY’09

The country’s mutual fund industry witnessed a nearly Rs 37,000 crore decline in its assets in the financial year 2008-09
The combined average assets under management (AUM) of the 35 fund houses in the country saw an erosion of Rs 36,798.58 crore, or 6.94 per cent, and dropped to Rs 4,93,286.56 crore at the end of March, according to the data released by the Association of Mutual Funds in India.The average AUM had been Rs 5,30,085.15 crore at the end of March in 2008.
Reliance Mutual Fund was the biggest loser and recorded losses to the tune of Rs 9,975 crore, accounting for nearly a third of the industry’s loss. However, it remained the top fund house in the country with an AUM of Rs 80,962.94 crore at the end of March this year.
Of the 35 fund houses, seven registered gains totaling Rs 36,499.73 crore.
Among the top five fund houses, HDFC MF and LIC MF registered a rise of Rs 13,183.28 crore and Rs 9,036.21 crore, respectively, while the other four - Reliance MF, ICICI Prudential, UTI MF and LIC MF - lost a combined over Rs 13,093 crore from their assets.
Fidelity MF, SBI MF and Taurus MF emerged as the other big losers during the financial year 2008-09.
The Bombay Stock Exchange benchmark Sensex has plunged 38 per cent year-on-year from 15,644.40 points in March 2008, to 9,700 levels in March 2009.Other fund houses which saw additions to their assets include Birla Sunlife MF, Canara Rebeco MF and Kotak Mahindra MF, with a rise of Rs 11,190.18 crore, Rs 1,858.81 crore and Rs 133.41 crore respectively in their AUMs.

Saturday, April 4, 2009

MF industry sees erosion of Rs 8,000 cr in March

The mutual fund industry witnessed a drop of nearly Rs 8,000 crore in its assets in March, plunging below the Rs 5,00,000-crore mark, even as 12 fund houses, including HDFC MF, saw an addition to their kitty.
The combined average assets under management (AUM) of the 34 fund houses in the country saw an erosion of Rs 7,709.10 crore, or 1.54 per cent, and dropped to Rs 4,93,264.28 crore at the end of March, according to the data released by the Association of Mutual Funds in India.
At the end of February, the average AUM had been Rs 5,00,973.38 crore.
Among the top five fund houses, only HDFC MF registered a rise of Rs 1,092.05 crore in its AUM at Rs 57,956.45 crore in March, while the other four — Reliance MF, ICICI Prudential, UTI MF and LIC MF — lost a combined over Rs 4,308.53 crore from their assets.
Of the 34 fund houses, 12 recorded an increase in their AUMs, adding Rs 4,370.46 crore during last month.
“Bank which invest mostly in liquid funds have withdrawn significantly as March was a financial year closing. This has led to a plunge in the assets of the fund houses,” Taurus Mutual Fund Managing Director R K Gupta said.
Reliance MF maintained its position as the top fund house in the country even as its AUM dropped.

Just click away from joining most active Mutual Fund India google group

Google Groups
Subscribe to Mutual Fund india
Email:
Visit this group

Aggrasive Portfolio

  • Principal Emerging Bluechip fund (Stock picker Fund) 11%
  • Reliance Growth Fund (Stock Picker Fund) 11%
  • IDFC Premier Equity Fund (Stock picker Fund) (STP) 11%
  • HDFC Equity Fund (Mid cap Fund) 11%
  • Birla Sun Life Front Line Equity Fund (Large Cap Fund) 10%
  • HDFC TOP 200 Fund (Large Cap Fund) 8%
  • Sundram BNP Paribas Select Midcap Fund (Midcap Fund) 8%
  • Fidelity Special Situation Fund (Stock picker Fund) 8%
  • Principal MIP Fund (15% Equity oriented) 10%
  • IDFC Savings Advantage Fund (Liquid Fund) 6%
  • Kotak Flexi Fund (Liquid Fund) 6%

Moderate Portfolio

  • HDFC TOP 200 Fund (Large Cap Fund) 11%
  • Principal Large Cap Fund (Largecap Equity Fund) 10%
  • Reliance Vision Fund (Large Cap Fund) 10%
  • IDFC Imperial Equity Fund (Large Cap Fund) 10%
  • Reliance Regular Saving Fund (Stock Picker Fund) 10%
  • Birla Sun Life Front Line Equity Fund (Large Cap Fund) 9%
  • HDFC Prudence Fund (Balance Fund) 9%
  • ICICI Prudential Dynamic Plan (Dynamic Fund) 9%
  • Principal MIP Fund (15% Equity oriented) 10%
  • IDFC Savings Advantage Fund (Liquid Fund) 6%
  • Kotak Flexi Fund (Liquid Fund) 6%

Conservative Portfolio

  • ICICI Prudential Index Fund (Index Fund) 16%
  • HDFC Prudence Fund (Balance Fund) 16%
  • Reliance Regular Savings Fund - Balanced Option (Balance Fund) 16%
  • Principal Monthly Income Plan (MIP Fund) 16%
  • HDFC TOP 200 Fund (Large Cap Fund) 8%
  • Principal Large Cap Fund (Largecap Equity Fund) 8%
  • JM Arbitrage Advantage Fund (Arbitrage Fund) 16%
  • IDFC Savings Advantage Fund (Liquid Fund) 14%

Best SIP Fund For 10 Years

  • IDFC Premier Equity Fund (Stock Picker Fund)
  • Principal Emerging Bluechip Fund (Stock Picker Fund)
  • Sundram BNP Paribas Select Midcap Fund (Midcap Fund)
  • JM Emerging Leader Fund (Multicap Fund)
  • Reliance Regular Saving Scheme (Equity Stock Picker)
  • Biral Mid cap Fund (Mid cap Fund)
  • Fidility Special Situation Fund (Stock Picker)
  • DSP Gold Fund (Equity oriented Gold Sector Fund)