Franklin Templeton's Sivasubramanian KN: The Intelligent Investor

Superstar fund manager Sivasubramanian KN has helped one of India’s oldest fund houses give consistent returns. Now, he wants the next line of fund managers to take over

CAPTAIN OF THE SHIP Franklin Templeton’s Sivasubramanian at the Thiruvanmiyur Beach in Chennai. There is no light on the first floor of Century Center at Alwarpet as the city, like the rest of Tamil Nadu, suffers from frequent outages. But most people inside the Franklin Templeton mutual fund office don’t bother to move from their cubicles. They form silhouettes in the glow of their laptops and there is hardly any conversation. They continue to work. Considering that Uttar Pradesh has just declared its election results and the stock market is almost in a tizzy, the mood inside one of India’s largest fund houses is surprisingly serene. Sivasubramanian KN, chief investment officer-equity, sits quietly in a small conference room blessed by the afternoon Chennai sun. Like his team, he is nonchalant about the power situation in his office and in Uttar Pradesh. He doesn’t have any electronic device around him to keep a tab on the markets and doesn’t seem to be bothered about the way the Sensex was behaving that day. “Working in Chennai allows us to cut the noise and concentrate on our work,” he says softly. Sivasubramanian spends most of his time trying to spot companies that will make profits over the long term and also fit in his overall portfolio. Something he’s been doing with aplomb for nearly two decades. The Rs 5,000-crore Bluechip fund that Sivasubramanian managed is the oldest private sector mutual fund scheme in the country—it was floated in 1993—and has consistently outperformed the market. In the past 15 years, Bluechip has given a return of 22 percent, compared with a category average of 16. According to Morningstar India, it has a very high alpha (or excess returns against the benchmark index) at 6.89 percent. Most of its peers hover around the 3 percent mark. So, if you had invested Rs 10,000 in the Bluechip fund in March 2002, your money would have grown to Rs 93,000 now, against a category average of Rs 57,000. But what makes Sivasubramanian stand out is not just the stellar performance of the Bluechip fund. It is also the investment philosophy that he has managed to create at Franklin Templeton in India—one that’s based on sound logic and intensive research rather than individual brilliance. In other words, he’s trying to become irrelevant. This is a marked shift from the prevalent culture in the Indian mutual fund space where top fund managers create an aura around themselves and try to become indispensable. “He takes his craft very seriously, but doesn’t take himself seriously as a fund manager,” says Pramod Kumar, CEO of Wealth Advisors India, a Chennai-based independent investment advisory firm and a former colleague of Sivasubramanian. The Philosophy of Investment   The investment philosophy of Sivasubramanian has helped Franklin Templeton in two ways. One, it identified the next level of leaders at the fund house. The strong focus on research allowed analysts to become co-fund managers and learn the ropes of successfully managing a portfolio early on in their careers. Already, Anand Radhakrishnan, who was earlier the head of research, has taken over Bluechip and is managing it successfully since 2008. “The system is based on merit. Senior colleagues ensure that their knowledge is passed on and there is always a hand-holding that takes place so that juniors don’t have to reinvent the wheel,” says Radhakrishnan. Two, it helped Franklin Templeton weather the 2008 global economic crisis much better than most other funds which were seduced into investing in sectors that looked hot, but were not fundamentally sound. “We believe that research is more important than portfolio management. We want to develop research as a distinct platform for analysts,” says Sivasubramanian. The years since the crisis have been brutal for mutual funds to say the least with the European debt crisis, Japanese earthquake and political instability further weakening sentiment. The Sensex (the Bombay Stock Exchange’s benchmark index) has been brooding around the 17,000 mark and struggled to break the shackles. For most equity funds it has been a tough time as there is no momentum and there are no favourite sectors. The number of funds outperforming the index has been dwindling and almost 53 percent of the funds have fared poorly for the last three years. But even in such conditions, Franklin Templeton is one of the few funds that has managed to ride the tide and maintain its high performance regardless of the state of the markets. Again, this has been possible because of the strong focus on research and having analysts with complete knowledge of their sectors as co-fund managers.

The idea of having research analysts as co-fund managers was not a brainwave or something that Franklin Templeton followed right from the beginning in India. It was something that Sivasubramanian and his equally-distinguished colleague Sukumar Rajah stumbled upon when the Flexicap scheme was launched in 2005 and collected around Rs 3,000 crore in its new offer. Rajah and Sivasubramanian decided to take a stab at jointly managing the fund. The experiment was a brilliant success as it brought in a second, and possibly different, perspective on all decisions. More than anything else, succession planning was now easier as research analysts were exposed to portfolio management at an early stage.

All this has gone a long way in making Franklin Templeton, the only profit-making, foreign-owned asset management company (AMC) in India. So, how did this foreign fund survive in India when others have failed?

Acquisition And its After-Effects
The answer to that probably lies in the way it went about its acquisition of Pioneer ITI (Kothari Pioneer Mutual Fund). Though Franklin Templeton has been in India since 1996, it took over the assets of Pioneer ITI only in 2002. When it did so, it retained not just the employees, but also the distribution network of independent financial advisors that Pioneer ITI had assiduously built over the years. Franklin Templeton, in its earlier avatar, had been like most other foreign players—its schemes were sold through banks.

Besides Bluechip and Prima—the main schemes—Pioneer ITI gave Franklin Templeton two other valuable assets: Rajah and Sivasubramanian, two experienced fund managers known for their knack of picking winners.

“When you are acquiring something which you think is valuable to you, it is important that you give the investment team total independence. This has been Franklin Templeton’s approach across the globe and the investment team continued to function the way they used to earlier,” says Harshendu Bindal, president, Franklin Templeton Investments-India.  And that’s not all. The investment team was also allowed to operate out of Chennai, a move that helped retain the talent in the team as many of them preferred to work there.

One of the first decisions that the team took was to keep focussing on what it were really good at—investment research. “A researcher is better placed to take a call on individual companies compared to a portfolio manager as they [portfolio managers] have to look at too many companies,” says Sivasubramanian, who had himself begun his career at Pioneer ITI as a research analyst.

Currently, the fund has 10 research analysts and four fund managers, making Franklin Templeton’s equity investment team one of the biggest in the mutual fund industry. Five of the research analysts are co-fund managers.

It’s not that a research analyst’s job at Franklin Templeton is any different. Here too they have to create a model portfolio and give recommendations. But unlike most AMCs, they are paid on par with portfolio managers and the model portfolio they create is taken very seriously by the fund managers. Most other funds ignore the recommendations of their research teams and the portfolio managers are in total command.

“It is a place where research analysts get their skin in the game as portfolio managers very early in their career path. That doesn’t happen in other places,” says Anand Vasudevan who is head of research and also the co-fund manager of Flexicap and Bluechip.

In 2006, Radhakrishnan, the then head of research, was made the co-fund manager of Bluechip. In a year’s time he became the fund manager for Bluechip, taking over from Sivasubramanian who decided to play a passive role as co-fund manager. Radhakrishnan was handpicked by Sivasubramanian and Rajah for the job after he proved his mettle by bringing 10 hybrid funds of Franklin Templeton under one strategy.

By November 2010, Sivasubramanian was promoted as CIO and Rajah moved on to become the CIO for Franklin Asia equity.

Big Shoes to Fill Sivasubramanian’s shoes were rather large for Radhakrishnan to fill when he took over Bluechip. But working closely with Sivasubramanian had taught him a few tricks. He realised that Sivasubramanian was a man of conviction. The moment he was convinced about a particular stock he put a lot of money into it. He maintained a concentrated portfolio and it was not unusual to see almost 7-8 percent of the funds invested into a single stock. “I think I’m conservative when it comes to portfolio management. I got to learn a lot from Sivasubramanian about how he goes on taking the concentrated bets,” says Radhakrishnan. Sivasubramanian himself is happy to play the mentor’s role and share the knowledge he has gained over the years with his team.

Like all others, it was in Mumbai that Sivasubramanian cut his teeth.  Working with the project finance team at IDBI taught him the skill to dissect financial statements and understand the importance of a company’s ability to repay debt over the long term. He also learnt the significance of cash flows as well as the ability to study new emerging businesses. But there was one thing that he never quite learned or appreciated—the daily commute between Andheri and Nariman Point on a Mumbai local. So, when he heard about an opening with Kothari Pioneer in Chennai he was keen to take it.

He wanted to go back to his parents and the quiet of Chennai.

Within a year of him joining as a research analyst with Kothari Pioneer, he was promoted to manage Bluechip. Soon Sukumar Rajah too joined as chief investment officer. Rajah had been advising the India Opportunities Fund, jointly managed by Indbank and Martin Currie, an international investment manager. He came into the Kothari team with a wealth of knowledge on emerging sectors. He was one of the earliest investors to take a bet on Infosys at the India Opportunities Fund. Before investing in Infosys, he had met the company’s management many times and also visited the company’s office.

Rajah believed that Infosys had a huge cost advantage over its US counterparts and started to invest in the company through the Prima fund too. By 1997, Infosys became the top holding of Prima.

Kothari Pioneer was the first fund to start an information technology fund in 1998. But when the sector began to show qualities of a bubble in 1999, it checked out. “We never sold out completely. We bought the sector much ahead of our peers and booked profits,” says Rajah.

HDFC Bank was another great pick of theirs. The stock was purchased when it was a midcap as both Sivasubramanian and Rajah believed that HDFC Bank had a great brand and would be able to raise deposits at competitive rates.

Sivasubramanian began to manage the Prima fund in 1997. In the same year they decided that Bluechip will concentrate on large-cap companies and Prima on small- and midcap ones. In many ways, it was more challenging for Sivasubramanian to manage the Prima fund as the portfolio needed more stocks to maintain diversification and ensure liquidity.  “If we liked a particular stock we have never shied away from investing into it even if it was illiquid. We would only limit the overall exposure to the illiquid component of the portfolio,” says Sivasubramanian.

Sivasubramanian also learned to interact with a company’s management better and ask the right kind of questions. He started to focus on businesses that were using or deploying capital smartly and avoided conglomerates that were getting into areas that were not their core. “Good companies will not be available, cheap and poor management is always punished,” Sivasubramanian says.

In 2007, the Bluechip fund did not perform as well as some of its peers. But that was because Sivasubramanian and Rajah decided against investing in the real estate sector. They were not convinced by it. The fund grew 47 percent against 60 percent for the BSE 100 index that year. But 2008 and the global financial crisis proved them right. The Bluechip fund fell too (no sector escaped unscathed), but not as much as its peers.

“Bluechip is quite value-conscious and does not shy away from exiting momentum driven sectors, when valuations breach its comfort zone. On the flipside, it also doesn’t shy from taking contrarian calls from time to time. One example would be its overweight position in telecom in 2010, when others were shying away from that space,” says Dhruva Chatterji, senior research analyst at Morningstar India.

People who have worked with Sivasubramanian vouch that he never gets excited by volatile trends in the market. But for now, Sivasubramanian and Rajah have built a powerful fund house that functions like a well-oiled machine. For them, it’s not about success or whether they complement each other as a team. What they want to do is build strong processes that will last long after them. It sure looks like they are trying really hard to make themselves redundant.

Source: http://forbesindia.com/article/boardroom/franklin-templetons-sivasubramanian-kn-the-intelligent-investor/32632/0

Are sectoral funds worth making an investment into?

Banking sector funds as a category topped the performance charts in the past three months with 23.62% return. But the same category of funds is the worst performer if you look at the one-year performance - the category lost 14.58% during the period. The story is same with infrastructure funds, too: they have gained 15.32% in the past three months, but lost 12.75% over the past one year.

Similarly, most Sectoral funds with higher exposure to the power sector have outperformed other funds by a wide margin in the last quarter of 2007 (calendar year), but they lost heavily in the first quarter of CY2008, as the market corrected. As you can see, the data - sourced from Value Research, a mutual fund tracking firm - presents a confusing picture.

Especially for investors who are in search of sectoral funds to beat the broader market. But that is the hallmark of sectoral funds, which can be cyclical or extremely sensitive to even a minute change in their respective business environment.

RATIONALE
Alpha - the extra returns over the overall market returns - is a dream for many investors. And sector dedicated funds sometime do deliver on this count. According to Morningstar India , another mutual fund tracking firm, if you had invested in FMCG funds, you would have earned an average 10.57% return in CY2011.

On the other hand, if you had invested in large-cap oriented equity schemes, you would have lost 24.46% during the same period. A look at the accompanying table will tell you that sectoral funds have occupied slots for top three performing ranks in the past seven years, except for a stray year of CY2009, when small- and mid-cap diversified funds as a category occupied the second rank with 95.36% returns.

In short, if you expect a sector to grow faster than the economy, you can consider investing in a fund dedicated to the sector. "Banking sector should benefit from the secular growth of the Indian economy in the long term, while recent the Budget provisions should be beneficial for the infrastructure and power sectors. Investors can consider investing in funds dedicated to these sectors," says Naresh Kumar Garg, CEO & CIO, Sahara Mutual Fund.

However, a higher return is not the only reason why investors should look at a sector fund. "A sector fund can be used sparingly in times of volatile market conditions to make your portfolio defensive. You can invest in a healthcare fund or an FMCG fund for this purpose," says Devangi Bhuta, vice president, Gurukshetra.com, an investment advisory and training portal.

According to Morningstar India, FMCG and healthcare funds as a category have shown lower volatility over the long term compared to diversified equity funds. Over five years, healthcare funds and FMCG funds have recorded lower standard deviation of 27.63 and 22.14, respectively; compared to large cap funds (29.78) and mid- & small-cap funds (32.49).

 

BE MINDFUL ABOUT THE RISKS
A sector fund leaves the fund manager with limited options, as he has a mandate to invest only within the sector. If the sector enters a bad phase, the fund manager can do very little. A look at the performance of these schemes (See Table) also underlines the fact that you cannot simply invest in the 'best performing sector fund' of last year and sit quietly for it to deliver.

To your surprise, you may find that the same sector is not in the top league anymore. That is why it is extremely important that you should have a clear view of the sector. Also, never invest too much in a sector fund as it increases risk. For example, if a professional employed in an information technology firm, with stock options of his company , invests in a technology sector fund thinking that it is a high growth sector, he may be sitting on a huge risk.

Here most of his cash flows, fortune and investment are tied to the future of IT sector and any adverse development in that sector can have a devastating impact on his finances. If you are convinced with the growth prospects of a sector, you can invest in that sector's funds; but restrict your exposure to these funds to 10-15 % of your equity portfolio.

HOW TO CHOOSE ONE
"Short-term performance may give a distorted picture to investors due to high volatility, especially in the case of sectoral funds, where the stock universe is rather small. Always look at the long-term performance, say, more than three years, to arrive at an informed decision," says Naresh Kumar Garg. Long-term track record is just one parameter to start with.

Another important factor you have to look at is the portfolio composition. "If you are considering a healthcare fund while building a defensive portfolio, a high MNC exposure may be better than a fund portfolio comprising Indian midand small-cap companies during volatile market conditions," says Devangi Bhuta. If you are in a volatile market such as the one we are in now, probably a large-cap oriented sector fund may be better to start with.

Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/personal-finance/savings-centre/analysis/are-sectoral-funds-worth-making-an-investment-into/articleshow/12499286.cms?curpg=2

Rajiv Gandhi Equity Scheme must include mutual funds to control the risk for investors: Akshay gupta, CEO & Managing Director, Peerless Mutual Fund

Akshay gupta, CEO & Managing Director, Peerless Mutual Fund

Peerless Mutual Fund focuses on smaller tier II and tier III towns. Its CEO and managing director Akshay Gupta tells Babar Zaidi how the proposed Rajiv Gandhi Equity Scheme will add depth to the markets, how difficult it is to convince first-time investors and why the scheme should include mutual funds as well.

What's there for small investors in the Rajiv Gandhi Equity Scheme?
Paying tax is a big concern for Indians and this new deduction will certainly be a big incentive to enter the market. Right now there are about 3.5 crore equity investors in India, but over 10 crore people earn more than Rs 2 lakh a year. My guess is that many of them will want to avail of this new exemption after they exhaust their Section 80C limit. They may not invest Rs 50,000, maybe Rs 10,000-20,000. Even so, this will bring long-term money into the market. It is a step in the right direction because it will give a fillip to equity investing. Besides, Rs 50,000 a year is a sizeable limit and will add depth to a market that is on FII steroids.

Should mutual funds be included?
Mutual funds should certainly be a part of this because a fund manager can handle the risk much better than a first-time investor in equities. There are indications that the scheme will be confined to the top 100 stocks but I don't think this is enough of a safeguard for small investors. Satyam Computer was an index-based stock and look what happened. Institutional investors had started exiting Satyam much before the scam broke out. Similarly, they got rid of Unitech much before the writing was on the wall. However, small investors got stuck with these stocks. Mind you, both Satyam and Unitech were in the top 100 stocks by market capitalisation. If a small investor is left holding such scrips and cannot get out before the lock-in period, he will be ruined.
 

What is the way out?
The government should open the scheme to mutual funds. Let mutual funds manage it and diversify the risk for the investor. Remember, these are first-time investors, who may not understand the risks involved. An investment of Rs 50,000 is a big sum for a person earning Rs 5 lakh a year-it's more than the money he earns in a month. Mutual funds will allow him to invest systematically through SIPs, which will reduce his risk.

Peerless Mutual Fund focuses on tier II and tier III towns. What has been your experience there?
The concerns of the first-time investor are no different from those of the repeat investor. The risk-reward ratio is the uppermost concern. They compare the returns with those of fixed deposits and real estate. The memory of the Indian investor is very short and his investment strategy is sharply focused on certainty of returns. He will prefer to lock in at 9% assured returns offered on a fixed deposit for five years even though equity investments would yield a better return.

How difficult it is to convince a first-time investor to put money in stocks?
It is an uphill task. You have to show them charts of SIP returns, tell them the India growth story and explain why stocks will do well in the long term. In smaller towns, real estate is the preferred investment choice, followed by gold and fixed deposits. People don't understand stocks as an asset class, so it is very difficult to convince them to invest in equity mutual funds. In large cities, people are familiar with stocks and the acceptance ratio is far higher.

Are the KYC norms a major hurdle in smaller towns?
They are because a lot of people don't have the basic documentation in place. Investors in tier II cities have PAN cards but in tier II towns, many don't have these. They have either not applied or may have applied but the issuance has become an operational hazard.

Have the unified KYC norms been of any help?
They have, but I will be happier if all the regulators come together and have a common KYC platform. I believe this is happening and will ease the investment process for the customer as well as lower the costs for the industry.

Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/personal-finance/mutual-funds/analysis/rajiv-gandhi-equity-scheme-must-include-mutual-funds-to-control-the-risk-for-investors-akshay-gupta-ceo-managing-director-peerless-mutual-fund/articleshow/12482361.cms?curpg=1

FMP mania grips investors.

It's the season of fixed maturity plans (FMPs). Mutual fund houses launched as many as 149 FMPs in March, as investors rushed to lock themselves into high interest rates and also take advantage of the double-indexation benefits provided by this product. Uncertain and volatile equity markets also contributed to demand for these fixed income products, mutual fund executives said.

FMPs are close-ended funds with a fixed tenure and invest in a portfolio of debt products, whose maturity coincides with the maturity of the product. The primary objective of an FMP is to generate income while protecting the capital, by investing in debt and money market securities.

The fourth quarter of FY12 was robust in terms of FMP launches. During the period, the domestic fund industry launched 313 FMPs. According to data from fund tracking firm Value Research, there is a rise of 30 per cent in FMP launches in March this year compared with the same period last year.

“Prevailing rates are very attractive. Investors have a feeling that they may not get such high rates for long and hence such a good demand for FMPs,” said Jaideep Bhattacharya, chief marketing officer of UTI Mutual Fund. Currently, FMPs are offering as high as 10-11 per cent, in many cases better than bank fixed deposits.

In the last few weeks of the financial year, there’s been a mad rush to invest in FMPs. This is thanks to the availability of the benefits of double indexation for those who stay invested in these instruments for a little over a year. That is, those who invest this March in an FMP which matures after 13-14 months, will get the benefits of both FY12 and FY13.

Since inflation has been high throughout the year, the inflation index, too, will be high for this financial year. As a result, when investors redeem the FMPs next year in April or later, they will get handsome indexation benefits. This will reduce their tax burden substantially.

“By entering during such times, investors avail the double indexation benefits,” said Sanjay Sachdev, chief executive officer of Tata Mutual Fund. “Investors have a clear preference for fixed income products and the trend has been visible for quite some time now. People are parking their funds in FMPs to benefit from the high interest rates,” he added.

Since the investments made during the last few days of the fiscal spill over into a financial year that represents a two-year holding period, though the actual holding tenure is just over a year, investors can avail of indexation benefits, say officials.

Industry executives say institutional investors had always been fond of such products. Now, there is a large participation from retail investors, too.

“Investors are wary of volatile equities and they are waiting for an appropriate time to enter. But for the time being, they are showing preference for fixed income products,” said UTI MF’s Bhattacharya.

However, industry executives do not see continuation of large number of launches in the coming months as interest rates are expected to come down.

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/fmp-mania-grips-investors/469780/