Indian stocks have bottomed: Gopal Agrawal, Mirae Asset

Indian equities are unlikely to fall much further as they are already trading at a 15-20 per cent discount to 10-year average multiples, said Gopal Agrawal, chief investment officer at Mirae Asset Mutual Fund's Indian mutual fund unit.

A significant slowdown in China and further problems with bank funding in Europe are the only two factors that could lead to capitulation in Indian shares, he said in an interview.

On Tuesday data showed China's economy expanded at its weakest pace in 2-1/2 years in the latest quarter, with the sagging real estate and export sectors heralding a sharper slowdown in coming months.

Consensus estimates are already pricing in 10 per cent earnings growth for the fiscal year starting April 1, he noted.

"Chances of this going further down are lower on hopes of a revival in the economy, rate cuts and rupee appreciation," said Agrawal, who manages Rs 4.5 billion ($87.61 million) of Indian equities.

The extent and timing of rate cuts by the Reserve Bank of India will largely depend on tax collections and whether the rupee starts to appreciate after hitting a record low in December.

Mirae India is bullish on sectors that have rupee-linked costs and dollar-linked revenues, such as IT, pharmaceuticals and select metal stocks, as it believes the rupee's depreciation has not yet been fully taken into account.

The rupee was the worst performer among Asian currencies in 2011, losing nearly 16 per cent against the dollar.

On Tuesday the Indian rupee held on to a two-month high, buoyed by dollar inflows and a surge in the local equities as global risk appetite improved after better-than-expected growth data from China.

Over the past six months, the consensus estimate for earnings per share for India's benchmark 30-share index for fiscal year 2013 has fallen to Rs 1,250-1,260 from more than Rs 1,400, Agrawal said.

Mirae Asset's India Opportunities Fund, ranked fifth by Lipper for Indian Equity total return performance, has about a fifth of its total allocations in software and pharma stocks.

Its Emerging Bluechip Fund has about 17 per cent of its assets in those sectors.

The fund is bearish on select infrastructure and capital goods and telecom companies, which require heavy capital investment.

Mirae's India Opportunities Fund has 5.9 per cent of total assets in capital goods, construction and telecom stocks. Its Emerging Bluechip Fund has 2.14 per cent of its assets in those sectors.

The fund expects the RBI to cut the cash reserve ratio -- the amount of funds banks need to hold at the central bank -- as a way to boost liquidity, and then cut repurchase rate over the next four to five months, Agrawal said.

The central bank raised rates 13 times between March 2010 and October 2011 in its attempt to tame inflation.

Earnings by Sensex-30 stocks will boosted by Rs 100 billion if state-run ONGC, which has a 3.3 per cent weighting in the index, is not required to take on more than a third of the government's expected additional fuel subsidy.

India's oil ministry is seeking an additional subsidy of Rs 420 billion ($8 billion) from the government for the six months ending March 2012, Oil Secretary G.C. Chaturvedi said in December.

The subsidy is used to partially compensate state-run oil marketing firms for selling fuels at state-set cheaper rates.

Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/analysis/indian-stocks-have-bottomed-gopal-agrawal-mirae-asset/articleshow/11524409.cms?curpg=2

Kenneth Andrade: Look at firms that shrink balance sheets

He has worked in the Indian mutual fund industry for more than 15 years. He picks tomorrow’s blue-chip stocks from today’s numerous mid-cap companies.

Investment philosophy: He hitched his fund wagon to the theme of consumption and food inflation more than two years ago and his top picks too have remained the same over that period.

Other interests: Stays in Mumbai and is slightly partial to Toto’s, that classic of a pub in the queen of the Mumbai suburbs, Bandra.

What is your outlook for 2012?

The environment now is very challenging and I don’t expect it to change in 2012 either. Obviously, the smaller companies will face a number of challenges both in the near term and in building their businesses over a period of time.

The cost of capital is going to be a challenge for the end of this year and also the beginning of next year. Base rates today are at about 11 percent in the banking system. So your cost of capital to be in operation is anywhere between 13-15 percent.

That’s a very high cost to pay to be in business. Profitability is next to nothing. 

How can an investor take advantage of this choppy environment, and do any thematic plays come to mind?

In an environment like this, markets usually consolidate. Either companies acquire additional assets or companies acquire customers. Let’s assume there’s an industry of 10 companies. Five won’t survive. The other five will double. They will take all the customers. That’s a big opportunity to tap. You have to identify the five companies who will survive! Look at cement. Ambuja, ACC and Ultratech had 60 percent of the market share in 2000. Currently they have 30 percent and all of them are debt free. All the other companies have huge amounts of debt. These guys will go back to 60 percent.

Some more examples please...

I don’t think one should look at companies from a capitalisation point of view. One should look at where the business is. If you want a large cap company in the FMCG space you only have three or four companies to choose from. There’s no number six or seven. But the entire business is dominated by smaller players. By capitalisation they are small. India’s largest retail company is a mid-cap company. That doesn’t mean it is a small company.

Where do mid-cap companies come from? 

Let me give you an example. Education is a multi-billion dollar opportunity in India. The problem is that it is so fragmented. So we need one entrepreneur to only consolidate the business. From that we will get one of India’s largest companies. None of these guys will invent this space. They will only have a service offering that will consolidate the market share.

How important is it to consider scaling up as a factor for midcap companies?

We look at a fragmented space and look at one company that can scale up the space. That’s our approach. Take sugar and it is Shree Renuka Sugars. It’s a Rs. 85,000 crore industry, but you have around 360 companies in that industry. You have private sector mills then you have around 400-500 co-operative mills that are there. One guy has to come in and consolidate that entire space.

What special challenges to portfolio construction do you see in this difficult environment?

In constructing a portfolio we have two choices on how to buy. You either buy on valuation risk or you buy on solvency risk. We prefer to go with valuation risk because we don’t want our companies to die on us. Every company which is stress-free on its balance sheet is very expensive. The price earnings multiple of our portfolio is extremely high. What we have stayed away from is not to buy companies that have too much of debt. That is going to be our approach for 2012.

I think any company that can monetise its assets, i.e. put its assets into operation and can service its debt, will come out on top. The other option and opportunity is to take the assets that are there on their books and sell them in the market and reduce the cost of their balance sheet. Look at companies who are reducing the size of their balance sheets. They are the ones to buy. One parameter that I will be closely looking for, in the next financial year i.e. 2013 is any company which is going into 2013-14 with a smaller balance sheet. I think those kind of companies are going to come out on top.

In your view, is the idea of strategic consolidation relevant to financial services as well?

Today, everyone is worried about how the banks are going to manage the delinquencies in the banking system. Let’s look at 2013. If corporate India maintains the current debt-equity ratio, their banks will refuse to fund incremental stress. They’ll only lend to guys who are financially disciplined. And financially disciplined guys are people who reduce their balance sheet. It’s all about availability of capital or liquidity for the next round of growth. The guys who are completely leveraged will not get the money. This is how the equity business has behaved in the last three years; this is how the lenders will behave in the next three years because the lenders will become extremely risk averse. That’s probably my only parameter to watch in 2012-13.

You will grow, not because the sector is growing, but because you are gaining market share. The growth will not come because of incremental profitability. The cost of acquired market share will show in your margins. And in the next cycle you will show profitability.

Source: http://ibnlive.in.com/news/andrade-look-at-firms-that-shrink-balance-sheets/221614-55.html

Neighbours are not financial wizards

Love thy neighbour is a common adage, but most people extend it to include financial decisions as well. For instance, a sustained rise or a sudden fall in the stock market is often observed due to frenzied buying in bubbles and selling in crashes.

In fact, as a recent study by Ameriprise Financial India shows, Indian investor even used this ‘follow the neighbour’ formula for purchasing insurance, gold and other financial instruments as well.

There are strong preferences for certain products in specific cities. No wonder, every city has its preference for certain instruments. Mutual funds and gold are preferred by Delhi, stocks are favoured by Mumbai, Chennai wants real estate and Bangalore is into debt. The survey was done between the age group of 28-45 and with an average annual household income in excess of Rs 12 lakh.

TWO DIFFERENT FAMILIES: YOU AND YOUR NEIGHBOURS

• Goals, time horizon will differ
• Risk-taking ability will differ
• Financial commitments will differ
• Age group may differ
• They share successes, not failures
• ...then, why follow them?

However, following the investment decisions of one's neighbour or friends or even relatives is not the best strategy. The culture of collaboration does not work while making financial decision for your family. There are a host of other reasons that should be considered while making investment decisions.

Your reason to save or invest may not be the same as your neighbour's. The other family may be investing for their child's school education, while you need it for higher education — clearly, the amounts required would be vastly different. For them, a 10-year debt instrument may work, whereas since the requirement is much more, you may have to opt for equity.

More importantly, your monthly outgo may be completely different. As financial planner Suresh Sadagopan says, individuals should count their priorities before copying. "When you have commitments, having cash in hand is important. And you have to account for it. But many don't," he says. Do not invest because somebody else is investing and he/she thinks you are missing out on something big.

Your neighbourhood uncle at 50 may be looking to earn 8.5 per cent on a 10-year NHAI bond, because it means a nice little safe corpus at the age of 60, when he retires. For you, at 30, it makes little sense. If the stock market falls further, there may be a good opportunity to enter and stay invested for the next 20 years.

Conversely, if you are 50, it makes more sense to stay away from high-risk, high-return products, because capital erosion is the last thing you want. Going with the good old bank fixed deposits or post office deposits may keep the corpus safe with steady returns.

Random investment is something that one should be wary of. The Ameriprise study talks about most individuals investing through real estate, insurance, gold and so on. But, none of these investors know if the asset class suits their profile.

However, you need to match your requirements to an asset class before investing. "For instance, real estate and start-ups could work wonders for some individuals, while it may end up being disastrous for others," explains Bimal Gandhi, chairman of Ameriprise Financial India. Therefore, do not pick a scheme just because good friends have done so.

Most important: It is unlikely that many will discuss their investment failures with you. Most will tell you about their successes. Certified financial planner Anil Rego says individuals see how their friend(s) have made money in an asset class/scheme. And then invest. "But, they fail to understand that this may or may not be the right time to enter that scheme. A classic example is gold and many are more than willing to enter gold now just because many have gained from it in the past year," he explains.

Source: http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/neighboursnot-financial-wizards/462019/