Much has been made of the so-called comparison between mutual funds and unit-linked insurance products (Ulips) in the recent past few months. Our opinion is that the public debate on these two investment options misses the bigger point.
The reality is that the bulk of the household savings for Indian families is tied up in bank accounts earning 3.5 per cent interest and in FDs — both of which are highly inefficient investment options for wealth creation.
Add to this the rising inflation that has touched double digit, and therefore, it becomes even more scarier that most of us still prefer to leave our money in a bank, rather than in instruments that give higher returns — be it equity mutual funds or ulips or probably direct investment in equity markets.
So the real debate should be whether families in their effort to create wealth are making a mistake in leaving their money in the bank while they should be penciling in on other investment instruments like mutual funds and ulips that offer a reasonable prospect of better long-term returns.
Mutual Funds v/s ULIPs - no big deal
Call it a turf war or clash of regulators, frankly in the long run it's not a big deal from the end customer's perspective. Whether its SEBI or IRDA, consumers should feel comfortable and secure that there is a regulator who is mandated to look after their interests.
Every investment instrument has pros and cons. We challenge you to find one that is perfect. So, there will always be promoters or detractors of both mutual funds and Ulips.
Objectively speaking, however, there is a better chance of you being able to meet your long-term financial goals through equity mutual funds and/or a Ulip than the default option for most Indians, which is to leave money in the bank.
Almost every one of us will have one of the following goals that will require a substantial amount of money in the future: funding our graduate education, marriage, house purchase, taking care of children's financial needs, funding their education and marriage, being adequately funded towards our own retirement.
Experience from all over the world has shown that our salaries are not enough to fund these goals. We need to invest into the capital markets, subject to our risk taking capacity, to take advantage of the compounding of capital, i.e., money that creates more money. No lesser authority than Albert Einstein remarked, "compounding is the eighth wonder of the world because it allows for the systematic accumulation of wealth".
The advantage of equity mutual funds and Ulips is that they are instruments that offer you a better rate of compounding for your capital than cash lying in the bank, and thereby provide a better chance of creating wealth in the long run.
Savings accounts and FD - bad dosage for financial health
Let's make ourselves clear. Savings accounts and FDs have a purpose and we cannot over generalise and make a blanket statement that they are bad instruments. However, when it comes to wealth creation they are not good instruments for you to invest through. We will show you why.
First of all, a savings account earns you a mere 3.5 per cent interest rate, a level that is fixed arbitrarily. Similarly, a fixed deposit contractually fixes the rate of return at the start date of your deposit, and you cannot earn more than what you signed up for, even if interest rates in the markets were to rise.
Compare this to a return that the equity market can earn you. History and experience of equity markets from around the world suggests that in the long-term equity markets are likely to "compound your capital" at approximately 12 per cent per annum. Compared to this, a 3.5 per cent savings account return just does not match up.
Secondly, savings accounts and FDs are highly tax inefficient. Any interest you earn through these will be taxable in your hands as income, and you will be liable to pay tax on this income.
Compare this to equity mutual funds and Ulips where at least for the time being until the new direct tax code is implemented you pay zero taxes on your gains if you hold these instruments for the long-term. And, if you invest into an equity linked savings scheme of mutual funds, you might find this an even more tax efficient investment than a regular mutual fund.
Finally, and perhaps most crucially, by leaving your money in a bank or an FD, you are losing the purchasing power of that money. Because you are earning a fixed return through these instruments, these instruments cannot offset the corrosive effect of inflation or rising prices within the economy.
If one's bank account returns only 3.5 per cent pre-tax, but the level of prices is rising at 10 per cent, one doesn't have to be a mathematical genius to figure out that in the long run one's standard of living will suffer. You will hardly be able to create any wealth, because whatever returns you earn does not even help you keep pace with the rising prices in the economy, let alone give you a surplus that can earn you further returns.
If you are already wealthy then FDs might be a good wealth preservation instrument, but please don't use them to create wealth for yourself.
Don't sit idle, invest actively
Putting your money into a savings account of an fixed deposit is almost akin to sitting idle. India is going through an inflection, which is likely to last for a few decades, where the equity capital markets will be the best avenue for long-term investment and a good way to build an alternate and legitimate source of wealth. If you believe in India's economic growth potential, then move at least some of your money from your bank account into a higher yielding instrument to give yourself a fair chance to create long-term wealth.
Source: http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/FDs-can-be-hazardous-for-your-wealth-creation-plan/642271/
Posts
